YUNEX LIMITED public-sector contracts

Recent award timeline

Research YUNEX LIMITED in transport and logistics procurement

The retained evidence covers 2 distinct procurement records and 2 named buyers: Norfolk County Council; Durham County Council. The latest retained publication is “Traffic Signals and Intelligent Transport Systems”, published 9 November 2026.

Use the buyer and contract title together when researching comparable requirements. Open each official release to check the tender description, award status and lot allocation before treating this supplier as a comparable provider. This is a bounded source sample, not a complete contract portfolio.

What to check for this supplier

• For “Traffic Signals and Intelligent Transport Systems”, establish which deliverables Norfolk County Council described and verify the award status and scope.
• Check whether the named supplier received a direct contract or a framework position; appointment alone does not establish guaranteed revenue.
• Compare the published requirements with your own capability profile before pursuing a similar opportunity.

Published scope and award details

The following evidence belongs to “Traffic Signals and Intelligent Transport Systems”, published by Norfolk County Council. It is a historical source snapshot reviewed on 10 November 2026, not a live availability check.

Procurement procedure

Competitive flexible procedure

Status on the retained award

active — a source status, not proof of an open tender

Award identifier

1

Release identifier

106244-2026

Period recorded on this award

Not stated on this retained award; check the contract details and later releases.

Suppliers named on this award

1

Notice scope excerpt

The contract will cover: - a) Maintenance of the existing traffic signals network and of intelligent transport equipment including but not limited to vehicle activated signs, variable message signs, car park guidance signs and rising bollards. b) Supply and installation of traffic signal equipment working with the Council's main works contractor or other principal contractors on larger scale or more complex schemes. c) Supply and installation of traffic signals and intelligent transport equipment working as the principal contractor on smaller, less complex schemes that are predominantly traffic signals or intelligent transport related with only relatively minor highway engineering works. d) Supply and installation of traffic signal equipment and intelligent transport equipment for scheduled upgrades and new sites.

The excerpt describes the procurement as a whole. It does not establish this supplier’s individual deliverables or lot allocation. This excerpt may be truncated. Source wording about applications or deadlines is historical and must not be read as an invitation to bid now.

Read the complete official release and lot allocation ↗

Contracts explicitly linked to this award

These contract records reference award 1 in the same retained release. They are shown separately from the award fields. Values are not annual revenue and may cover several suppliers; no total or per-supplier allocation is inferred.

Procurement route and comparison checks

The retained procedure is “Competitive flexible procedure”. To compare a future bid with this award, locate the original notice and evaluation documents from Norfolk County Council; the award alone does not establish the route for a future purchase.

• Buyer match: confirm that requirements from Norfolk County Council are comparable to the buyer, location and service scale you intend to target.
• Delivery scope: use the excerpt above to identify deliverables, exclusions and technical constraints. Verify each against the complete documents before claiming a capability match.
• Timing: check the award-specific period above against later contract notices. A missing date is unknown; it is not a renewal signal.

This profile is an independent research aid from Team J8VEST. It is not an endorsement by, or an affiliation with, the named supplier or buyer. The sample is not the supplier’s complete contract portfolio.

Published scope and award details

The following evidence belongs to “Supply of traffic signal components”, published by Durham County Council. It is a historical source snapshot reviewed on 10 November 2026, not a live availability check.

Procurement procedure

Direct award

Status on the retained award

pending — a source status, not proof of an open tender

Award identifier

1

Release identifier

106037-2026

Period recorded on this award

2026-11-19T00:00:00Z to 2030-06-01T23:59:59+01:00

Suppliers named on this award

1

Notice scope excerpt

Supply of traffic signal components required for the repair and maintenance of traffic signals equipment.

The excerpt describes the procurement as a whole. It does not establish this supplier’s individual deliverables or lot allocation. This excerpt may be truncated. Source wording about applications or deadlines is historical and must not be read as an invitation to bid now.

Read the complete official release and lot allocation ↗

Procurement route and comparison checks

The retained procedure is “Direct award”. Read the buyer’s justification and any framework or exemption reference; this award is not an invitation to compete and does not establish a future competitive tender.

• Buyer match: confirm that requirements from Durham County Council are comparable to the buyer, location and service scale you intend to target.
• Delivery scope: use the excerpt above to identify deliverables, exclusions and technical constraints. Verify each against the complete documents before claiming a capability match.
• Timing: check the award-specific period above against later contract notices. A missing date is unknown; it is not a renewal signal.

This profile is an independent research aid from Team J8VEST. It is not an endorsement by, or an affiliation with, the named supplier or buyer. The sample is not the supplier’s complete contract portfolio.

Questions for a bid or market team

• Which published requirements and lots led to YUNEX LIMITED being named?
• What evidence would a supplier need for comparable transport and logistics procurement?
• Do later notices change the term, value, scope or status of these awards?

Answer these questions from the complete procurement pack and later notices. Store the source URL, publication date and exact field behind every conclusion. A supplier name in an award does not prove present capacity, customer satisfaction, future demand or revenue attributable to that supplier.

How to interpret this record

The timeline is evidence of published procurement history, not a lead score. Values can describe a lot, ceiling, estimate or whole contract and must not automatically be treated as annual supplier revenue. Framework appointment does not guarantee call-off work.

Check the original tender, lot structure, duration, modifications and termination notices. Compare several awards before calling a pattern repeatable, and label every inference separately from source facts.

Related supplier workflow

Compare related supplier evidence

These profiles share the transport and logistics procurement research category. Similar categorisation does not establish direct competition or equivalent capabilities.