TELENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LIMITED public-sector contracts

Recent award timeline

Research TELENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LIMITED in UK public procurement

The retained evidence covers 1 distinct procurement record and 1 named buyer: Transport for London. The latest retained publication is “Windrush Line Transmission System and LAN WAN Design and Build”, published 9 November 2026.

Use the buyer and contract title together when researching comparable requirements. Open each official release to check the tender description, award status and lot allocation before treating this supplier as a comparable provider. This is a bounded source sample, not a complete contract portfolio.

What to check for this supplier

• For “Windrush Line Transmission System and LAN WAN Design and Build”, establish which deliverables Transport for London described and verify the award status and scope.
• Check whether the named supplier received a direct contract or a framework position; appointment alone does not establish guaranteed revenue.
• Compare the published requirements with your own capability profile before pursuing a similar opportunity.

Published scope and award details

The following evidence belongs to “Windrush Line Transmission System and LAN WAN Design and Build”, published by Transport for London. It is a historical source snapshot reviewed on 13 November 2026, not a live availability check.

Procurement procedure

Competitive flexible procedure

Status on the retained award

active — a source status, not proof of an open tender

Award identifier

1

Release identifier

106250-2026

Period recorded on this award

2026-11-30T00:00:00Z to 2029-11-29T23:59:59Z

Suppliers named on this award

1

Notice scope excerpt

This procurement is for the design, supply, installation, testing, commissioning and handover of replacement transmission systems and LAN/WAN infrastructure supporting the London Overground Windrush Line. The project will renew ageing and increasingly obsolete telecommunications assets to improve network reliability, resilience, maintainability and operational performance. The scope includes associated surveys, design development, migration planning, implementation, testing and commissioning activities necessary to deliver a fully operational telecommunications network whilst maintaining continuity of railway operations throughout the delivery period.

The excerpt describes the procurement as a whole. It does not establish this supplier’s individual deliverables or lot allocation. This excerpt may be truncated. Source wording about applications or deadlines is historical and must not be read as an invitation to bid now.

Read the complete official release and lot allocation ↗

Procurement route and comparison checks

The retained procedure is “Competitive flexible procedure”. To compare a future bid with this award, locate the original notice and evaluation documents from Transport for London; the award alone does not establish the route for a future purchase.

• Buyer match: confirm that requirements from Transport for London are comparable to the buyer, location and service scale you intend to target.
• Delivery scope: use the excerpt above to identify deliverables, exclusions and technical constraints. Verify each against the complete documents before claiming a capability match.
• Timing: check the award-specific period above against later contract notices. A missing date is unknown; it is not a renewal signal.

This profile is an independent research aid from Team J8VEST. It is not an endorsement by, or an affiliation with, the named supplier or buyer. The sample is not the supplier’s complete contract portfolio.

Questions for a bid or market team

• Which published requirements and lots led to TELENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LIMITED being named?
• What evidence would a supplier need for comparable UK public procurement?
• Do later notices change the term, value, scope or status of these awards?

Answer these questions from the complete procurement pack and later notices. Store the source URL, publication date and exact field behind every conclusion. A supplier name in an award does not prove present capacity, customer satisfaction, future demand or revenue attributable to that supplier.

How to interpret this record

The timeline is evidence of published procurement history, not a lead score. Values can describe a lot, ceiling, estimate or whole contract and must not automatically be treated as annual supplier revenue. Framework appointment does not guarantee call-off work.

Check the original tender, lot structure, duration, modifications and termination notices. Compare several awards before calling a pattern repeatable, and label every inference separately from source facts.

Related supplier workflow

Compare related supplier evidence

These profiles share the UK public procurement research category. Similar categorisation does not establish direct competition or equivalent capabilities.