Quantum IT Europe Ltd public-sector contracts

Recent award timeline

Research Quantum IT Europe Ltd in digital and technology procurement

The retained evidence covers 1 distinct procurement record and 1 named buyer: Coventry University. The latest retained publication is “Inplace software”, published 3 November 2026.

Use the buyer and contract title together when researching comparable requirements. Open each official release to check the tender description, award status and lot allocation before treating this supplier as a comparable provider. This is a bounded source sample, not a complete contract portfolio.

What to check for this supplier

• For “Inplace software”, establish which deliverables Coventry University described and verify the award status and scope.
• Check whether the named supplier received a direct contract or a framework position; appointment alone does not establish guaranteed revenue.
• Compare the published requirements with your own capability profile before pursuing a similar opportunity.

Published scope and award details

The following evidence belongs to “Inplace software”, published by Coventry University. It is a historical source snapshot reviewed on 13 November 2026, not a live availability check.

Procurement procedure

Below threshold - without competition

Status on the retained award

active — a source status, not proof of an open tender

Award identifier

1

Release identifier

104231-2026

Period recorded on this award

Not stated on this retained award; check the contract details and later releases.

Suppliers named on this award

1

Notice scope excerpt

InPlace is a specialist placement and mobility management platform that is already established across Coventry University Group and supports the management of student mobility activity, including exchange programmes, study abroad opportunities, international placements, risk management processes, partner institution records, student workflows, approvals, reporting, and associated UKVI compliance requirements. The requirement is not for a generic student management system but for the continuation of an existing platform that has been configured to meet the University's specific operational and regulatory requirements. Significant investment has already been made in system implementation, process design, user training, data migration, testing, and integration with existing University processes. Obtaining three comparable quotations or running a competitive tender is not practical in this instance because alternative suppliers would not be able to provide a like-for-like comparison without a detailed procurement exercise, system evaluation, implementation assessment, and consideration of the costs associated with replacing the existing platform. Any alternative solution would require the migration of historical mobility records and student data, redevelopment of established workflows, retraining of staff, reconfiguration of reporting structures, and extensive testing to ensure continuity of service and compliance with University requirements. Replacing the current platform would create significant operational disruption and introduce risk to the management of student mobility programmes, including student support, partner institution management, activity tracking, health and safety oversight, and funding scheme reporting. Renewal of the existing contract therefore represents the most cost-effective and lowest-risk approach, ensuring continuity of service while protecting the University's investment in established processes, data, and staff expertise. The value of the contract is below the threshold of £207,720.00 including VAT, which is the threshold for tendering or awarding a compliant direct award from a framework

The excerpt describes the procurement as a whole. It does not establish this supplier’s individual deliverables or lot allocation. This excerpt may be truncated. Source wording about applications or deadlines is historical and must not be read as an invitation to bid now.

Read the complete official release and lot allocation ↗

Contracts explicitly linked to this award

These contract records reference award 1 in the same retained release. They are shown separately from the award fields. Values are not annual revenue and may cover several suppliers; no total or per-supplier allocation is inferred.

Procurement route and comparison checks

The retained procedure is “Below threshold - without competition”. To compare a future bid with this award, locate the original notice and evaluation documents from Coventry University; the award alone does not establish the route for a future purchase.

• Buyer match: confirm that requirements from Coventry University are comparable to the buyer, location and service scale you intend to target.
• Delivery scope: use the excerpt above to identify deliverables, exclusions and technical constraints. Verify each against the complete documents before claiming a capability match.
• Timing: check the award-specific period above against later contract notices. A missing date is unknown; it is not a renewal signal.

This profile is an independent research aid from Team J8VEST. It is not an endorsement by, or an affiliation with, the named supplier or buyer. The sample is not the supplier’s complete contract portfolio.

Questions for a bid or market team

• Which published requirements and lots led to Quantum IT Europe Ltd being named?
• What evidence would a supplier need for comparable digital and technology procurement?
• Do later notices change the term, value, scope or status of these awards?

Answer these questions from the complete procurement pack and later notices. Store the source URL, publication date and exact field behind every conclusion. A supplier name in an award does not prove present capacity, customer satisfaction, future demand or revenue attributable to that supplier.

How to interpret this record

The timeline is evidence of published procurement history, not a lead score. Values can describe a lot, ceiling, estimate or whole contract and must not automatically be treated as annual supplier revenue. Framework appointment does not guarantee call-off work.

Check the original tender, lot structure, duration, modifications and termination notices. Compare several awards before calling a pattern repeatable, and label every inference separately from source facts.

Related supplier workflow