Oracle Health public-sector contracts

Recent award timeline

Research Oracle Health in health and care procurement

The retained evidence covers 1 distinct procurement record and 1 named buyer: Croydon Health Services NHS Trust. The latest retained publication is “CHS - Acute Electronic Patient Record (EPR) Contract Extension”, published 6 November 2026.

Use the buyer and contract title together when researching comparable requirements. Open each official release to check the tender description, award status and lot allocation before treating this supplier as a comparable provider. This is a bounded source sample, not a complete contract portfolio.

What to check for this supplier

• For “CHS - Acute Electronic Patient Record (EPR) Contract Extension”, establish which deliverables Croydon Health Services NHS Trust described and verify the award status and scope.
• Check whether the named supplier received a direct contract or a framework position; appointment alone does not establish guaranteed revenue.
• Compare the published requirements with your own capability profile before pursuing a similar opportunity.

Published scope and award details

The following evidence belongs to “CHS - Acute Electronic Patient Record (EPR) Contract Extension”, published by Croydon Health Services NHS Trust. It is a historical source snapshot reviewed on 13 November 2026, not a live availability check.

Procurement procedure

Award procedure without prior publication of a call for competition

Status on the retained award

active — a source status, not proof of an open tender

Award identifier

105806-2026-1

Release identifier

105806-2026

Period recorded on this award

Not stated on this retained award; check the contract details and later releases.

Suppliers named on this award

1

Notice scope excerpt

Croydon Health Services NHS Trust proposes to extend its existing contract with Oracle Health for the provision of its acute Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system, commencing on 29th December 2026 for an initial period of three years, with an option to extend for a further 12 months.<br/><br/>The proposed arrangements cover the continued provision of the core EPR software and associated clinical applications, application management, hosting, software licensing, maintenance and technical support services. These services support the Trust's existing clinical and operational activities and the integration of the EPR with other systems across its digital infrastructure.<br/><br/>The proposed arrangements also incorporate changes to the existing scope, including the removal of certain voice recognition, in-application training and user guidance functionality. Additional requirements include increased system user capacity, enhanced application management support, upgrade management services, and further integrated clinical functionality supporting blood transfusion administration and milk management to meet the Trust's operational requirements. A trial of AI-enabled clinical functionality will also be included to evaluate its potential benefits and inform the Trust's future EPR requirements.<br/><br/>The existing EPR operates within a complex and highly integrated technical environment, with established interfaces, clinical workflows and dependencies across the Trust’s wider digital infrastructure. The additional functionality must operate effectively and safely within this environment, maintaining compatibility with the core EPR platform and associated clinical systems.<br/><br/>Introducing an alternative supplier at this stage would present significant technical and interoperability challenges, including the need for additional integration, configuration, testing, clinical safety assurance and ongoing support arrangements. This could create disproportionate technical difficulties and operational risks to established clinical services, alongside unnecessary duplication of implementation, integration and support costs. Continuing with the incumbent supplier will preserve compatibility with the existing EPR environment and enable the proposed requirements to be delivered through established technical and operational arrangements.<br/><br/>The proposed three-year extension, with an option for a further 12 months, reflects the complexity of maintaining and supporting a highly integrated clinical system while accommodating the Trust’s naturally evolving clinical and operational requirements. The optional fourth year recognises the complexity of a major clinical system procurement and transition, providing for circumstances where additional time may be required to complete implementation, data migration and associated integration activities while maintaining continuity of essential clinical services.<br/><br/>The Trust is separately progressing its longer-term EPR strategy, which will include a competitive procurement for its longer-term EPR requirements. The proposed extension is intended to maintain continuity of the existing EPR environment throughout the competitive procurement process, and support implementation and transition to the future arrangements.<br/><br/>The estimated total value of the proposed extension, including the optional fourth year, is approximately £17,549,439 excluding VAT.

The scope excerpt is taken from explicitly linked lot 1. This excerpt may be truncated. Source wording about applications or deadlines is historical and must not be read as an invitation to bid now.

Read the complete official release and lot allocation ↗

Contracts explicitly linked to this award

These contract records reference award 105806-2026-1 in the same retained release. They are shown separately from the award fields. Values are not annual revenue and may cover several suppliers; no total or per-supplier allocation is inferred.

Procurement route and comparison checks

The retained procedure is “Award procedure without prior publication of a call for competition”. To compare a future bid with this award, locate the original notice and evaluation documents from Croydon Health Services NHS Trust; the award alone does not establish the route for a future purchase.

• Buyer match: confirm that requirements from Croydon Health Services NHS Trust are comparable to the buyer, location and service scale you intend to target.
• Delivery scope: use the excerpt above to identify deliverables, exclusions and technical constraints. Verify each against the complete documents before claiming a capability match.
• Timing: check the award-specific period above against later contract notices. A missing date is unknown; it is not a renewal signal.

This profile is an independent research aid from Team J8VEST. It is not an endorsement by, or an affiliation with, the named supplier or buyer. The sample is not the supplier’s complete contract portfolio.

Questions for a bid or market team

• Which published requirements and lots led to Oracle Health being named?
• What evidence would a supplier need for comparable health and care procurement?
• Do later notices change the term, value, scope or status of these awards?

Answer these questions from the complete procurement pack and later notices. Store the source URL, publication date and exact field behind every conclusion. A supplier name in an award does not prove present capacity, customer satisfaction, future demand or revenue attributable to that supplier.

How to interpret this record

The timeline is evidence of published procurement history, not a lead score. Values can describe a lot, ceiling, estimate or whole contract and must not automatically be treated as annual supplier revenue. Framework appointment does not guarantee call-off work.

Check the original tender, lot structure, duration, modifications and termination notices. Compare several awards before calling a pattern repeatable, and label every inference separately from source facts.

Related supplier workflow