MKG BUILDING SERVICES LTD public-sector contracts

Recent award timeline

Research MKG BUILDING SERVICES LTD in UK public procurement

The retained evidence covers 1 distinct procurement record and 1 named buyer: Hampshire County Council. The latest retained publication is “Stubbington Study Centre - Investigations to Kitchen & Dining Block 003X”, published 5 November 2026.

Use the buyer and contract title together when researching comparable requirements. Open each official release to check the tender description, award status and lot allocation before treating this supplier as a comparable provider. This is a bounded source sample, not a complete contract portfolio.

What to check for this supplier

• For “Stubbington Study Centre - Investigations to Kitchen & Dining Block 003X”, establish which deliverables Hampshire County Council described and verify the award status and scope.
• Check whether the named supplier received a direct contract or a framework position; appointment alone does not establish guaranteed revenue.
• Compare the published requirements with your own capability profile before pursuing a similar opportunity.

Published scope and award details

The following evidence belongs to “Stubbington Study Centre - Investigations to Kitchen & Dining Block 003X”, published by Hampshire County Council. It is a historical source snapshot reviewed on 13 November 2026, not a live availability check.

Procurement procedure

Below threshold - award under framework

Status on the retained award

active — a source status, not proof of an open tender

Award identifier

1

Release identifier

104957-2026

Period recorded on this award

Not stated on this retained award; check the contract details and later releases.

Suppliers named on this award

1

Notice scope excerpt

Proposed Intrusive Structural Investigations P15511 Stubbington Study Centre - Kitchen & Dining Block Half Term October (26, 27 & 28 October) - Up to 3 Days Duration The investigations will be undertaken jointly with the Structural Engineer and contractor, using a mobile access tower to facilitate safe access to high-level structural elements and roof connections. The building is understood to be an Elliott Medway system-built structure, comprising a lightweight timber-framed construction. The investigations are intended to confirm the existing construction, condition and structural adequacy of the timber frame and associated elements, and to inform future refurbishment proposals. Scope of Investigations The investigations are anticipated to include: Opening up selected internal and external wall areas to expose the timber structural frame. Confirmation of the Elliott Medway construction details, including timber member sizes, spacing and arrangement. Measurement and assessment of timber posts, studs, beams and bracing members. Exposure of timber post bases, sole plates and structural junctions at representative locations. Inspection for timber decay, rot, moisture ingress, insect attack and any deterioration resulting from the age of the building. Moisture content testing of exposed structural elements. Investigation of the interface between the timber frame, glazing system and external cladding. High-level inspection of roof trusses, purlins, wall plates, roof connections and structural fixings using the access tower. Confirmation of connection details between roof and wall structures. Photographic recording of all exposed elements and defects. Localised opening-up as directed by the Structural Engineer should additional concerns be identified during the investigations. Purpose The findings will enable the Structural Engineer to: Verify assumptions made during the initial structural assessment. Assess the condition and remaining serviceability of the existing timber-framed Elliott Medway structure. Determine whether the building can be retained and refurbished, including any strengthening requirements. Inform future design development, cost planning and project options appraisal. Identify any further investigations that may be required. Access Requirements Mobile access tower for high-level inspections. Contractor attendance for opening-up and making-good works. Structural Engineer attendance during investigations. Completion of asbestos review and approval of intrusive works prior to commencement. Programme: 26, 27 and 28 October 2026 (Half Term) Duration: Up to 3 days, subject to findings on site.

The excerpt describes the procurement as a whole. It does not establish this supplier’s individual deliverables or lot allocation. This excerpt may be truncated. Source wording about applications or deadlines is historical and must not be read as an invitation to bid now.

Read the complete official release and lot allocation ↗

Contracts explicitly linked to this award

These contract records reference award 1 in the same retained release. They are shown separately from the award fields. Values are not annual revenue and may cover several suppliers; no total or per-supplier allocation is inferred.

Procurement route and comparison checks

For “Stubbington Study Centre - Investigations to Kitchen & Dining Block 003X”, distinguish appointment to the framework from a subsequent call-off. Check the relevant lot, call-off mechanism and whether the published amount is a ceiling before estimating accessible work.

• Buyer match: confirm that requirements from Hampshire County Council are comparable to the buyer, location and service scale you intend to target.
• Delivery scope: use the excerpt above to identify deliverables, exclusions and technical constraints. Verify each against the complete documents before claiming a capability match.
• Timing: check the award-specific period above against later contract notices. A missing date is unknown; it is not a renewal signal.

This profile is an independent research aid from Team J8VEST. It is not an endorsement by, or an affiliation with, the named supplier or buyer. The sample is not the supplier’s complete contract portfolio.

Questions for a bid or market team

• Which published requirements and lots led to MKG BUILDING SERVICES LTD being named?
• What evidence would a supplier need for comparable UK public procurement?
• Do later notices change the term, value, scope or status of these awards?

Answer these questions from the complete procurement pack and later notices. Store the source URL, publication date and exact field behind every conclusion. A supplier name in an award does not prove present capacity, customer satisfaction, future demand or revenue attributable to that supplier.

How to interpret this record

The timeline is evidence of published procurement history, not a lead score. Values can describe a lot, ceiling, estimate or whole contract and must not automatically be treated as annual supplier revenue. Framework appointment does not guarantee call-off work.

Check the original tender, lot structure, duration, modifications and termination notices. Compare several awards before calling a pattern repeatable, and label every inference separately from source facts.

Related supplier workflow

Compare related supplier evidence

These profiles share the UK public procurement research category. Similar categorisation does not establish direct competition or equivalent capabilities.