Hippo Digital Ltd public-sector contracts

Recent award timeline

Research Hippo Digital Ltd in digital and technology procurement

The retained evidence covers 1 distinct procurement record and 1 named buyer: Department for Education. The latest retained publication is “Digital Multi-Capability Services for Children & Families, Regions and wider DfE Services”, published 10 November 2026.

Use the buyer and contract title together when researching comparable requirements. Open each official release to check the tender description, award status and lot allocation before treating this supplier as a comparable provider. This is a bounded source sample, not a complete contract portfolio.

What to check for this supplier

• For “Digital Multi-Capability Services for Children & Families, Regions and wider DfE Services”, establish which deliverables Department for Education described and verify the award status and scope.
• Check whether the named supplier received a direct contract or a framework position; appointment alone does not establish guaranteed revenue.
• Compare the published requirements with your own capability profile before pursuing a similar opportunity.

Published scope and award details

The following evidence belongs to “Digital Multi-Capability Services for Children & Families, Regions and wider DfE Services”, published by Department for Education. It is a historical source snapshot reviewed on 13 November 2026, not a live availability check.

Procurement procedure

Award under framework

Status on the retained award

active — a source status, not proof of an open tender

Award identifier

1

Release identifier

106900-2026

Period recorded on this award

2026-11-30T00:00:00+00:00 to 2028-11-29T23:59:59+00:00

Suppliers named on this award

1

Notice scope excerpt

The Department for Education (DfE) requires a strategic delivery partner to provide multt disciplinary Digital, Data and Technology (DDaT) services and capabilities across the Children and Families Portfolio, Regions Group and where required, other DfE business areas. The Supplier shall work collaboratively with DfE to design, develop, deliver and continuously imporve digital services that support Departmental objectives, policy outcomes and ministerial priorities

The excerpt describes the procurement as a whole. It does not establish this supplier’s individual deliverables or lot allocation. This excerpt may be truncated. Source wording about applications or deadlines is historical and must not be read as an invitation to bid now.

Read the complete official release and lot allocation ↗

Procurement route and comparison checks

For “Digital Multi-Capability Services for Children & Families, Regions and wider DfE Services”, distinguish appointment to the framework from a subsequent call-off. Check the relevant lot, call-off mechanism and whether the published amount is a ceiling before estimating accessible work.

• Buyer match: confirm that requirements from Department for Education are comparable to the buyer, location and service scale you intend to target.
• Delivery scope: use the excerpt above to identify deliverables, exclusions and technical constraints. Verify each against the complete documents before claiming a capability match.
• Timing: check the award-specific period above against later contract notices. A missing date is unknown; it is not a renewal signal.

This profile is an independent research aid from Team J8VEST. It is not an endorsement by, or an affiliation with, the named supplier or buyer. The sample is not the supplier’s complete contract portfolio.

Questions for a bid or market team

• Which published requirements and lots led to Hippo Digital Ltd being named?
• What evidence would a supplier need for comparable digital and technology procurement?
• Do later notices change the term, value, scope or status of these awards?

Answer these questions from the complete procurement pack and later notices. Store the source URL, publication date and exact field behind every conclusion. A supplier name in an award does not prove present capacity, customer satisfaction, future demand or revenue attributable to that supplier.

How to interpret this record

The timeline is evidence of published procurement history, not a lead score. Values can describe a lot, ceiling, estimate or whole contract and must not automatically be treated as annual supplier revenue. Framework appointment does not guarantee call-off work.

Check the original tender, lot structure, duration, modifications and termination notices. Compare several awards before calling a pattern repeatable, and label every inference separately from source facts.

Related supplier workflow