Due Diligence Checking Ltd public-sector contracts

Recent award timeline

Research Due Diligence Checking Ltd in UK public procurement

The retained evidence covers 1 distinct procurement record and 1 named buyer: Imperial War Museums. The latest retained publication is “IWM/2627/Ops/3508: DBS Checking Services for IWM - AWARD NOTICE”, published 12 November 2026.

Use the buyer and contract title together when researching comparable requirements. Open each official release to check the tender description, award status and lot allocation before treating this supplier as a comparable provider. This is a bounded source sample, not a complete contract portfolio.

What to check for this supplier

• For “IWM/2627/Ops/3508: DBS Checking Services for IWM - AWARD NOTICE”, establish which deliverables Imperial War Museums described and verify the award status and scope.
• Check whether the named supplier received a direct contract or a framework position; appointment alone does not establish guaranteed revenue.
• Compare the published requirements with your own capability profile before pursuing a similar opportunity.

Published scope and award details

The following evidence belongs to “IWM/2627/Ops/3508: DBS Checking Services for IWM - AWARD NOTICE”, published by Imperial War Museums. It is a historical source snapshot reviewed on 13 November 2026, not a live availability check.

Procurement procedure

Below threshold - open competition

Status on the retained award

active — a source status, not proof of an open tender

Award identifier

1

Release identifier

107755-2026

Period recorded on this award

2027-01-01T00:00:00+00:00 to 2029-12-31T23:59:59+00:00

Suppliers named on this award

1

Notice scope excerpt

IWM was tendering for the provision of a Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) screening solution, including candidate registration, data capture, identity verification, right to work checks, communication with candidates, secure hosting, retention and deletion of information, and reporting to IWM. The service provider will be required to provide a secure online system that enables IWM to initiate, manage and monitor DBS screening checks for candidates. The solution must support both basic and enhanced screening levels, allow IWM to register candidates, and provide candidates with a clear and accessible process for submitting required information and documentation.

The excerpt describes the procurement as a whole. It does not establish this supplier’s individual deliverables or lot allocation. This excerpt may be truncated. Source wording about applications or deadlines is historical and must not be read as an invitation to bid now.

Read the complete official release and lot allocation ↗

Procurement route and comparison checks

The retained procedure is “Below threshold - open competition”. To compare a future bid with this award, locate the original notice and evaluation documents from Imperial War Museums; the award alone does not establish the route for a future purchase.

• Buyer match: confirm that requirements from Imperial War Museums are comparable to the buyer, location and service scale you intend to target.
• Delivery scope: use the excerpt above to identify deliverables, exclusions and technical constraints. Verify each against the complete documents before claiming a capability match.
• Timing: check the award-specific period above against later contract notices. A missing date is unknown; it is not a renewal signal.

This profile is an independent research aid from Team J8VEST. It is not an endorsement by, or an affiliation with, the named supplier or buyer. The sample is not the supplier’s complete contract portfolio.

Questions for a bid or market team

• Which published requirements and lots led to Due Diligence Checking Ltd being named?
• What evidence would a supplier need for comparable UK public procurement?
• Do later notices change the term, value, scope or status of these awards?

Answer these questions from the complete procurement pack and later notices. Store the source URL, publication date and exact field behind every conclusion. A supplier name in an award does not prove present capacity, customer satisfaction, future demand or revenue attributable to that supplier.

How to interpret this record

The timeline is evidence of published procurement history, not a lead score. Values can describe a lot, ceiling, estimate or whole contract and must not automatically be treated as annual supplier revenue. Framework appointment does not guarantee call-off work.

Check the original tender, lot structure, duration, modifications and termination notices. Compare several awards before calling a pattern repeatable, and label every inference separately from source facts.

Related supplier workflow