Cushman & Wakefield Debenham Tie Leung Limited public-sector contracts

Recent award timeline

Research Cushman & Wakefield Debenham Tie Leung Limited in UK public procurement

The retained evidence covers 1 distinct procurement record and 1 named buyer: Tees Valley Combined Authority. The latest retained publication is “TVCA-PROC-0928 - Brownfield Housing (BHF) Business Case Appraisal”, published 11 November 2026.

Use the buyer and contract title together when researching comparable requirements. Open each official release to check the tender description, award status and lot allocation before treating this supplier as a comparable provider. This is a bounded source sample, not a complete contract portfolio.

What to check for this supplier

• For “TVCA-PROC-0928 - Brownfield Housing (BHF) Business Case Appraisal”, establish which deliverables Tees Valley Combined Authority described and verify the award status and scope.
• Check whether the named supplier received a direct contract or a framework position; appointment alone does not establish guaranteed revenue.
• Compare the published requirements with your own capability profile before pursuing a similar opportunity.

Published scope and award details

The following evidence belongs to “TVCA-PROC-0928 - Brownfield Housing (BHF) Business Case Appraisal”, published by Tees Valley Combined Authority. It is a historical source snapshot reviewed on 13 November 2026, not a live availability check.

Procurement procedure

Below threshold - limited competition

Status on the retained award

active — a source status, not proof of an open tender

Award identifier

1

Release identifier

106915-2026

Period recorded on this award

2026-11-20T00:00:00+00:00 to 2027-11-19T23:59:59+00:00

Suppliers named on this award

1

Notice scope excerpt

Tees Valley Combined Authority (TVCA) (the 'Contracting Authority') have awarded a contract for a supplier to supply and deliver appraisal activities. The contracting authority reserves the right to modify the contract in reliance on Schedule 8 paragraph 5 of the Procurement Act 2023 where the contracting authority considers that a “known risk” has arisen. A “known risk” is a risk which could jeopardise the satisfactory performance of the contract but because of the nature of the risk it could not be addressed in the contract as awarded. The following risks have been identified as known risks 12 months with an option to extend for 12 months unless otherwise agreed in writing by the contracting authority. The contract may need to be extended or varied where a delivery risk arises that could not be fully resolved before contract award, and where the change is necessary, proportionate and limited to what is required to complete the services. Any extension or variation must be justified, recorded and approved by the TVCA in accordance with the contract terms and applicable procurement requirements. The number and timing of BHF project business cases requiring appraisal is dependent on programme delivery and applicant progression. As a result, the volume of appraisals or the phasing of appraisal activity may differ from that anticipated at contract award. Where this risk materialises and prevents satisfactory delivery of the contract within the original assumptions, TVCA may vary the contract value and/or term to the extent necessary to address the change in circumstances. The Contracting Authority may agree to vary the Contract Period where delays occur in the submission of project business cases, supporting evidence, or responses to requests for clarification from applicants, and such delays prevent the appraisal and assessment process from being completed within the original Contract Period. Any extension shall be limited to the period reasonably required to complete the outstanding appraisal activities and shall be subject to the Authority's approval. -The Contracting Authority may vary the Contract Period where the number of BHF project business cases requiring appraisal is materially higher than originally anticipated, or where changes to the phasing of appraisals across the programme prevent the appraisal and assessment process from being completed within the original Contract Period. Any extension shall be limited to the period reasonably required to complete the outstanding appraisal activities and shall be subject to the Authority's approval. -Additional appraisal activity required due to material changes to a project business case, revised costs, updated delivery programmes, funding changes or revised outputs. -The need for further review following clarification, re-submission or additional evidence where this is necessary to support robust assurance and funding recommendations. -Programme or governance timetable changes, including revised approval dates, additional assurance steps, appraisal panel requirements or decision-making delays. -Changes in relevant policy, guidance, funding conditions, subsidy control considerations or assurance requirements that affect the scope or timing of appraisal work. -Unforeseen complexity in individual projects, including land, planning, viability, delivery, financial or commercial issues requiring specialist input or additional review time. -The need to maintain continuity of independent appraisal support where a new procurement would risk delay, duplication of work, loss of audit trail or disruption to live assurance activity.

The excerpt describes the procurement as a whole. It does not establish this supplier’s individual deliverables or lot allocation. This excerpt may be truncated. Source wording about applications or deadlines is historical and must not be read as an invitation to bid now.

Read the complete official release and lot allocation ↗

Procurement route and comparison checks

The retained procedure is “Below threshold - limited competition”. To compare a future bid with this award, locate the original notice and evaluation documents from Tees Valley Combined Authority; the award alone does not establish the route for a future purchase.

• Buyer match: confirm that requirements from Tees Valley Combined Authority are comparable to the buyer, location and service scale you intend to target.
• Delivery scope: use the excerpt above to identify deliverables, exclusions and technical constraints. Verify each against the complete documents before claiming a capability match.
• Timing: check the award-specific period above against later contract notices. A missing date is unknown; it is not a renewal signal.

This profile is an independent research aid from Team J8VEST. It is not an endorsement by, or an affiliation with, the named supplier or buyer. The sample is not the supplier’s complete contract portfolio.

Questions for a bid or market team

• Which published requirements and lots led to Cushman & Wakefield Debenham Tie Leung Limited being named?
• What evidence would a supplier need for comparable UK public procurement?
• Do later notices change the term, value, scope or status of these awards?

Answer these questions from the complete procurement pack and later notices. Store the source URL, publication date and exact field behind every conclusion. A supplier name in an award does not prove present capacity, customer satisfaction, future demand or revenue attributable to that supplier.

How to interpret this record

The timeline is evidence of published procurement history, not a lead score. Values can describe a lot, ceiling, estimate or whole contract and must not automatically be treated as annual supplier revenue. Framework appointment does not guarantee call-off work.

Check the original tender, lot structure, duration, modifications and termination notices. Compare several awards before calling a pattern repeatable, and label every inference separately from source facts.

Related supplier workflow

Compare related supplier evidence

These profiles share the UK public procurement research category. Similar categorisation does not establish direct competition or equivalent capabilities.