Alma Economics public-sector contracts

Recent award timeline

Research Alma Economics in professional-services procurement

The retained evidence covers 1 distinct procurement record and 1 named buyer: Historic England. The latest retained publication is “Evaluation of the Places of Worship Renewal Fund - UID289”, published 12 November 2026.

Use the buyer and contract title together when researching comparable requirements. Open each official release to check the tender description, award status and lot allocation before treating this supplier as a comparable provider. This is a bounded source sample, not a complete contract portfolio.

What to check for this supplier

• For “Evaluation of the Places of Worship Renewal Fund - UID289”, establish which deliverables Historic England described and verify the award status and scope.
• Check whether the named supplier received a direct contract or a framework position; appointment alone does not establish guaranteed revenue.
• Compare the published requirements with your own capability profile before pursuing a similar opportunity.

Published scope and award details

The following evidence belongs to “Evaluation of the Places of Worship Renewal Fund - UID289”, published by Historic England. It is a historical source snapshot reviewed on 13 November 2026, not a live availability check.

Procurement procedure

Open procedure

Status on the retained award

active — a source status, not proof of an open tender

Award identifier

1

Release identifier

107483-2026

Period recorded on this award

Not stated on this retained award; check the contract details and later releases.

Suppliers named on this award

1

Notice scope excerpt

Historic England is seeking a supplier, or consortium, to deliver a multi-year evaluation of the Places of Worship Renewal Fund. The appointed supplier must provide a robust and proportionate evaluation design that assesses implementation, outcomes, contribution and value for money. The evaluation must be designed to produce actionable learning and evidence for Historic England and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. The evaluation must assess what difference, if any, the Places of Worship Renewal Fund condition and community use of historic places of worship, and the extent to which it contributes to wider place-based outcomes.

The excerpt describes the procurement as a whole. It does not establish this supplier’s individual deliverables or lot allocation. This excerpt may be truncated. Source wording about applications or deadlines is historical and must not be read as an invitation to bid now.

Read the complete official release and lot allocation ↗

Contracts explicitly linked to this award

These contract records reference award 1 in the same retained release. They are shown separately from the award fields. Values are not annual revenue and may cover several suppliers; no total or per-supplier allocation is inferred.

Procurement route and comparison checks

The retained procedure is “Open procedure”. To compare a future bid with this award, locate the original notice and evaluation documents from Historic England; the award alone does not establish the route for a future purchase.

• Buyer match: confirm that requirements from Historic England are comparable to the buyer, location and service scale you intend to target.
• Delivery scope: use the excerpt above to identify deliverables, exclusions and technical constraints. Verify each against the complete documents before claiming a capability match.
• Timing: check the award-specific period above against later contract notices. A missing date is unknown; it is not a renewal signal.

This profile is an independent research aid from Team J8VEST. It is not an endorsement by, or an affiliation with, the named supplier or buyer. The sample is not the supplier’s complete contract portfolio.

Questions for a bid or market team

• Which published requirements and lots led to Alma Economics being named?
• What evidence would a supplier need for comparable professional-services procurement?
• Do later notices change the term, value, scope or status of these awards?

Answer these questions from the complete procurement pack and later notices. Store the source URL, publication date and exact field behind every conclusion. A supplier name in an award does not prove present capacity, customer satisfaction, future demand or revenue attributable to that supplier.

How to interpret this record

The timeline is evidence of published procurement history, not a lead score. Values can describe a lot, ceiling, estimate or whole contract and must not automatically be treated as annual supplier revenue. Framework appointment does not guarantee call-off work.

Check the original tender, lot structure, duration, modifications and termination notices. Compare several awards before calling a pattern repeatable, and label every inference separately from source facts.

Related supplier workflow

Compare related supplier evidence

These profiles share the professional-services procurement research category. Similar categorisation does not establish direct competition or equivalent capabilities.